Sales
the "Sales" objective with real payments fed back into the account via CAPI — the algorithm learns from clients who buy, not just click.
I set up and run targeted ads in Instagram and Facebook through one Meta Ads account. I find your audience by interests and behavior — and create demand before a person even starts searching. Both platforms on one pixel, working toward your goal: leads, sales, payback.
Meta Ads — campaigns, audiences, and combinations built around your leads or sales.
— interests, lookalikes, retargeting of people who already engaged; for Instagram and Facebook at once.
— Stories, Reels, feed, carousels: I test several combinations and scale what works.
— so the algorithm sees real leads and purchases, not a fraction. That is end-to-end analytics.
— weekly I cut weak combinations, scale the winners, and keep cost per lead under control.
the "Sales" objective with real payments fed back into the account via CAPI — the algorithm learns from clients who buy, not just click.
on-site conversions or lead forms inside Instagram/Facebook (a request without leaving the app); the main focus for services and B2C.
when you need to bring people to a site, catalog, or profile cheaply.
for brands and launches; I am honest that this is the weakest goal for direct payback.
Usually both together. It is one Meta account and one pixel: the algorithm sends impressions where leads are cheaper.
For example: Instagram is more visual, a younger audience, strong in Reels and Stories; good for beauty, clothing, accessories, services. Facebook has an older, higher-spending audience, Marketplace and catalog; good for products and "grown-up" niches. If needed, we also run Threads in the same campaign.
That way you don't pay twice for the same audience across two separate campaigns — leads come out cheaper without picking the platform by hand. I set the split for you during the strategy session.
The ad spend — from $1000/mo (paid directly to Meta). My work (setup and management) is priced separately — management runs $600–900/mo (B2B from $1000/mo); I'll name the exact figure after the strategy session.
Ad budget benchmarks by niche for the Ukrainian market:
| Niche | Cost per result | Typical niche budget, ₴/mo |
|---|---|---|
| Local services (fitness, restaurants, auto service, cleaning) | lead 50–150 ₴ | from 20k ₴/mo |
| Beauty (cosmetology, salons, aesthetics) | lead/booking 40–150 ₴ | 20–25k ₴/mo |
| Online education (courses, schools, webinars) | registration 65–200 ₴ | 20–30k ₴/mo |
| Real estate and construction | lead 70–300 ₴ | 20–40k ₴/mo |
That way you plan the channel's full cost upfront, not just the Meta payment. Too small a budget won't work: Meta needs about 50 conversions in 7 days to learn. I'll name the exact figure after the strategy session.
These are market benchmarks by niche — what a channel typically needs to deliver. My own threshold is an ad budget from $1000/mo (~40k ₴), paid directly to the platforms. Full pricing breakdown — how much targeted advertising costs: budgets, setup cost and cost per lead by niche.
Real numbers from cases. You work directly with me — no agency markup, 2+ years of practice.
The request form lives on the Accelerator page — there you pick the format (Meta + Google, Meta only or Google only), so I know what to prepare the session for.
Pick a format and request a sessionThe ad spend itself (paid directly to Meta) — from $1000/mo. For example: in most niches the starting ad budget is from 20k ₴/mo; for online education and real estate the ceiling is higher (up to 30–40k). The floor is set by the algorithm: Meta needs about 50 conversions in 7 days to learn, so too small a budget never gathers that data. My work (setup and management) is priced separately — management runs $600–900/mo (B2B from $1000/mo); I'll name the exact figure after the strategy session (analytics, creatives and reports are included in management).
Usually yes — it is one Meta account and one pixel. For example: you set one budget, and impressions run in both Instagram and Facebook at once, and the algorithm sends traffic where the lead is cheaper. This is useful because you don't overpay for the same audience across two separate campaigns and get a lower cost per lead without picking the platform by hand.
The account delivers leads; the button only gives reach and likes. For example: in Ads Manager I set a "leads" or "sales" objective — which Boost simply has no option for — and get precise audiences, retargeting, and correct tracking. This is useful because you pay for real leads and sales, not abstract impressions, and you can see what each customer costs.
First leads often appear in the first days; the algorithm's learning phase takes 2–4 weeks; a stable cost per lead comes in 1–2 months; meaningful scaling by month 2–3. For example: the campaign "warms up" over the first weeks, until the ad set collects around 50 conversions, then the cost per lead levels off. This is useful so you set realistic expectations and don't switch the ads off at the start over "expensive" first days — what matters then is clean tracking and enough data.
Questions answered? Let's size your budget
Request a strategy session